Close Menu

    Arc Browser vs. Google Chrome: Which Browser is Better?

    The For Browser TeamBy Updated:No Comments8 Mins Read

    The browser wars rage on as companies continue innovating to create the best browsing experience. Two browsers at the forefront of this innovation are Arc and Google Chrome. Both provide fast, secure web browsing but take different approaches.

    This article compares Arc and Chrome across key categories to help you decide which browser is better for your needs. We’ll cover speed, privacy, features, customization, compatibility, security, performance, and more.

    Company Backgrounds

    First, let’s look at some background on the companies behind each browser.

    Arc

    • Founded in 2019 by Josh Miller and Hursh Agrawal
    • Based in New York City
    • Privately held startup company
    • First browser released in 2022 after closed beta testing
    • Currently available for Mac and iOS

    Google Chrome

    • First released in 2008
    • Developed by tech giant Google
    • Chrome is the most used browser globally
    • Available on all major desktop and mobile platforms

    As a newer startup, Arc offers an alternative to Chrome built by the dominant player Google.

    Speed

    Speed is essential for a good browsing experience. Slow browsers frustrate users. Both Arc and Chrome are known for speed:

    Page Load Times

    • Chrome uses the open-source Chromium engine along with Google’s optimization expertise for fast page loads.
    • Arc also uses Chromium so baseline page load times are similar.
    • Arc introduces tab suspension to freeze background tabs and conserve system resources for faster loading.

    Smooth Scrolling

    • Chrome prioritizes delivering a smooth scrolling experience.
    • Arc matches Chrome’s smooth scrolling as they share the same Chromium engine.
    • On low-powered machines, Chrome may scroll smoother whereas Arc suspends background processes.

    Memory Usage

    • Chrome is optimized to minimize memory usage despite many open tabs.
    • Arc can consume more memory with many tabs open as it keeps tabs active in the background.
    • Chrome’s lower memory profile makes it favorable for older computers.

    For raw page load speed, Arc and Chrome are comparable. But Chrome does better minimizing memory for smooth scrolling under heavy loads.

    Privacy

    Privacy is a growing concern among internet users. Browsers take different stances on user data:

    Chrome and User Data

    • Chrome sends usage data to Google to tailor services and ads.
    • Google account integration shares browsing history across Google services.
    • Enhanced tracking protection requires a signed-in Google account.
    • Privacy-conscious users may be wary of Chrome’s data collection.

    Arc and User Data

    • Arc does not collect private user data as a smaller company versus Google.
    • No account required to use Arc browser.
    • Tracking protection and ad blocking on by default without an account.

    For users prioritizing privacy, Arc is the safer choice given differences in how the companies collect and use data.

    Features

    The ideal browser offers the right mix of features without bloat. Here’s how Arc and Chrome compare on capabilities:

    Chrome Features

    • Sync browsing history across devices with Google account.
    • Cast tabs to Google Cast devices.
    • Translate webpages in 90 languages.
    • View web-based Google Docs, Sheets, Slides without downloading.
    • Chrome Web Store with thousands of extensions.

    Arc Features

    • Workspaces called “Spaces” to organize tabs.
    • AI assistant for web searches and queries.
    • Mini media player for audio and video.
    • Notebook for capturing screenshots and notes.
    • Access Chrome Web Store extensions.

    Chrome offers more robust sync and casting capabilities. But Arc provides innovative workspace, AI, and media features not found in Chrome.

    Ease of Use

    A browser’s usability impacts daily experience. We’ll compare how Arc and Chrome fare:

    Chrome Ease of Use

    • Simple interface familiar to most users.
    • Seamless Google account integration for syncing.
    • Omnibox with intuitive Google search built-in.
    • Customizable via Chrome Web Store extensions.
    • Accessible on any device logged into your Google account.

    Arc Ease of Use

    • New interface requires learning curve for some.
    • Sidebar for organizing tabs takes adjustment.
    • No automatic syncing across devices.
    • Innovative workspaces and AI enable advanced workflows.

    Chrome has the edge on familiarity and omni-device access. But Arc offers powerful customization for those willing to learn its features.

    Customization

    Customizing a browser to your preferences enhances the experience. Let’s explore customization options:

    Chrome Customization

    • Change default search engine.
    • Extensions allow some UI modifications.
    • Limited options beyond extensions.

    Arc Customization

    • Full theme support to customize interface.
    • Extensions enabled.
    • Customizable smart workspaces.
    • Notebooks to tailor content capture.
    • Highly configurable to user needs.

    Arc offers vastly greater customization like themes and smart workspaces. Chrome relies mainly on extensions.

    Compatibility

    A browser should work seamlessly with different platforms. Here’s how Chrome and Arc handle cross-platform use:

    Chrome Compatibility

    • Available on Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and Linux.
    • Syncs browsing data across devices via Google account.
    • Chrome Web Store provides cross-platform extension availability.
    • Chrome OS for cloud-first computing.

    Arc Compatibility

    • Currently Mac and iOS only, with Windows beta.
    • No cross-device syncing yet.
    • Access to Chrome Web Store extensions.

    Chrome is far more ubiquitous across platforms while Arc is newer and only on Apple devices currently.

    Security

    Security vulnerabilities can compromise user data. Browsers must provide robust protection.

    Chrome Security

    • Google’s vulnerability reward program encourages finding issues.
    • Enforces strong data protections for users logged in.
    • Quick fix and update releases when threats emerge.

    Arc Security

    • Leverages Chrome’s open-source security foundations.
    • Small company may lack resources of Google’s security team.
    • No account requirement limits data exposure.

    Chrome benefits from Google’s vast security resources. Arc uses Chrome’s code but as a newer browser long-term security remains unproven.

    Performance

    A browser must efficiently use system resources. Let’s compare how Arc and Chrome impact performance:

    Chrome Performance

    • Lean software efficiency minimizes CPU and RAM usage.
    • Each tab runs as an independent process for stability.
    • Occasional resource spikes with many tabs.

    Arc Performance

    • Similar efficiency to Chrome as a Chromium browser.
    • Tab suspension conserves resources but can delay tab switching.
    • Lower memory footprint expected based on design.

    In real-world use, Chrome and Arc are comparable in performance. Chrome is proven to manage resources well at scale.

    Web Standards Support

    Support for open web standards ensures correct rendering of sites and applications:

    Chrome’s Standards Support

    • Chrome actively contributes to evolving web standards.
    • Rapidly implements new HTML, CSS, JavaScript features.
    • Broad support for emerging capabilities like WebAssembly.

    Arc’s Standards Support

    • Relies on Chromium’s web standards support as an engine.
    • May lag slightly from Chrome in adopting very latest standards.
    • Unlikely to differ in core standards support.

    Chrome is on the cutting edge of web standards adoption. Arc utilizes Chrome’s engine so lags slightly behind.

    Mobile Experience

    Many users access the web on both desktop and mobile. How do the browsers compare for mobile?

    Chrome’s Mobile Experience

    • Fully featured apps available on both Android and iOS.
    • Syncs seamlessly via Google account.
    • Access to same Chrome Web Store extensions.
    • Uniform experience across mobile and desktop.

    Arc’s Mobile Experience

    • Companion Arc app for iOS only currently.
    • Limited feature set compared to desktop.
    • No cross-device syncing or shared extensions.
    • Mobile experience still in early stages.

    Chrome provides a significantly better mobile experience with full-featured iOS and Android apps.

    Developer Experience

    Developers need specialized tools for building sites and applications. How do the browsers compare for developers?

    Chrome’s Developer Experience

    • Includes excellent native developer tools.
    • Supports custom development workflows via extensions.
    • Seamless integration with Node.js and NPM ecosystem.
    • Emulation modes for testing mobile experiences.

    Arc’s Developer Experience

    • Developer tools powered by Chromium foundations.
    • Lacks deep customization seen in Chrome dev tools.
    • Dev mode available but not a primary focus currently.

    Chrome sets the standard for integrated developer tools and workflows. Arc cannot compete on developer experience yet.

    Stability

    Stability impacts the reliability of the browsing experience. How crash-resistant are each of the browsers?

    Chrome’s Stability

    • Time-tested stability with over a decade of improvements.
    • Each tab functions as a separate process for safety.
    • Rare serious crashes or hang-ups during normal use.

    Arc’s Stability

    • Still maturing as a relatively new browser.
    • Smaller user base uncovers fewer issues.
    • Overall comparable stability leveraging Chrome engine.

    Chrome’s longer track record demonstrates rock-solid stability. Arc appears reliable so far but lacks years of testing.

    Platform Availability

    The available platforms a browser can run on impacts adoption potential.

    Chrome’s Platform Availability

    • Windows, macOS, Chrome OS, Android, iOS.
    • Essentially universal platform support.

    Arc’s Platform Availability

    • Currently macOS and iOS only.
    • Limited to Apple ecosystem for now.

    Chrome is ubiquitous across platforms. Arc’s limited platform support curtails widespread usage currently.

    Conclusion

    Deciding between Arc versus Chrome depends on your priorities as a user. Key differences to consider:

    • Arc prioritizes privacy while Chrome leverages your usage data.
    • Chrome leads in omni-device support while Arc is newer.
    • Arc offers more customization through workspaces and themes.
    • For raw speed and tab handling, the browsers are similar.
    • Chrome has better web standards support and stronger developer tools.
    • Arc costs money while Chrome is free.
    • Chrome has far greater cross-platform availability.

    Neither browser is unequivocally “better” than the other. Evaluate your personal usage patterns, priorities, and needs to decide if the innovative Arc or ubiquitous Chrome makes more sense for you.

    Share.

    The For Browser Team is a group of web browser aficionados dedicated to spreading their extensive knowledge about all aspects of web browsers. With a strong background in computer science and years of collective experience building, testing, and optimizing various browsers, For Browser Team provides authoritative, in-depth guides on browsers like Google Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera, Brave, and more. Leveraging their expertise on browser architecture, functionality, extensions, themes, tips/tricks, vulnerabilities, and web standards compatibility, For Browser Team creates tutorials and explainers to empower everyday users in getting the most out of their browsers.

    Leave A Reply